Contact Me for a Free Consultation (941) 257-5003


Statements by Defendant Improperly Obtained

Posted by John P. Rutkowski | Apr 05, 2018 | 0 Comments

Confession given by defendant during police department interview prior to administration of Miranda warnings was improperly obtained. Confession occurred during custodial interrogation where it was clear from record that purpose of the interview was to obtain incriminating evidence from defendant and reasonable person in defendant's situation would not have felt free to leave. Moreover, defendant requested assistance of counsel prior to giving confession.

Coercion -- Under totality of circumstances, suggestions that interrogating officers could effect leniency, coupled with the representation that officer's opinion was superior to that of defendant's own counsel, amounted to outrageous police conduct, and there was a clear nexus between this outrageous conduct and defendant's confession. Trial court erred in denying motion to suppress. Error not harmless where improperly admitted statement was primary, if not the only, evidence tying defendant to charged offense. Read Entire Case Below:

About the Author

John P. Rutkowski

Mr. Rutkowski has been practicing law for the past twenty-five years. Prior to going to law school Mr. Rutkowski served as a deputy sheriff before retiring to attend law school. Upon graduating law school Mr. Rutkowski served as a prosecutor in Florida before going in to private practice and representing clients in three states.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact us

John P. Rutkowski, Attorney at Law, firm represents clients in the area of driving under the influence, boating under the influence, Criminal & Civil Traffic Offenses. Contact me today for a free telephone consultation.