Free Telephone Cosultation (941) 888-0709


Search and seizure, Traffic stop Motion to Suppress should have been granted

Posted by John P. Rutkowski | Apr 25, 2020 | 0 Comments

Search and seizure, Traffic stop, Search of vehicle subsequent to traffic stop during which officer detected the odor of marijuana. The trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to suppress where traffic stop for a broken tail light was unlawful. Section of chapter 316 that enumerates the requirements for tail lights does not prohibit the operation of a vehicle with a non-functioning tail light where there are two other fully operational lights. The evidence indisputably established that defendant's vehicle had two operational rear brake lights. For the stop to have been lawful the broken tail light must have posed a safety hazard, and state failed to present a particularized basis to suspect the vehicle was unsafe. It is not objectively reasonable to believe that a vehicle with a single broken tail light emitting some amount of white light would be unsafe where vehicle had two additional operating brake lights.

Read Entire Opinion Below:

About the Author

John P. Rutkowski

Mr. Rutkowski has been practicing law for the past twenty-seven years. Prior to going to law school Mr. Rutkowski served as a deputy sheriff before retiring to attend law school. Upon graduating law school Mr. Rutkowski served as an Assistant State Attorney in Florida before going in to private practice and representing good people in bad times who have been accused of criminal offenses, dui, and appeals.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment


Put Mr. Rutkowski's twenty-seven years experience practicing in the areas of DUI, BUI, Administrative Driver License Suspension Hearings, Administrative Hardship License Hearings and Criminal Traffic. Contact Mr. Rutkowski today for a free telephone consultation.

Paulson Center

18245 Paulson Drive Port Charlotte, FL 33954