Contact Me for a Free Consultation (941) 257-5003


Jurors Challenge for cause Impartiality Statements of defendant Confession

Posted by John P. Rutkowski | Jan 11, 2018 | 0 Comments

Jurors -- Challenge for cause -- Impartiality -- Statements of defendant -- Confession -- Jurors' belief in implausibility of false confession defense -- Error to deny cause strikes against jurors who indicated they would have difficulty accepting that a person accused of a serious crime could falsely admit guilt -- Jury -- Deliberations -- Playback of testimony -- Error to allow jury to hear playback of only first 20 minutes of victim's testimony, including only direct examination and excluding cross-examination, where it cannot be said beyond a reasonable doubt that the partial playback did not contribute to conviction -- While jury may decide what evidence to focus on during deliberations, and there is no need to create a bright-line rule that a trial court is required to force-feed the jury portions of playback the jury deems unnecessary, the trial court failed to inquire into the specifics of the testimony to be reheard or to confirm that the jury had no need to hear unrequested portions.

About the Author

John P. Rutkowski

Mr. Rutkowski has been practicing law for the past twenty-five years. Prior to going to law school Mr. Rutkowski served as a deputy sheriff before retiring to attend law school. Upon graduating law school Mr. Rutkowski served as a prosecutor in Florida before going in to private practice and representing clients in three states.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact us

John P. Rutkowski, Attorney at Law, firm represents clients in the area of driving under the influence, boating under the influence, Criminal & Civil Traffic Offenses. Contact me today for a free telephone consultation.