Contact Me for a Free Consultation (941) 257-5003


DUI Search & Seizure Blood Draw

Posted by John P. Rutkowski | May 31, 2018 | 0 Comments

The trial court properly found that collection and handling of blood samples obtained at medical facility to which defendant had been transported substantially complied with applicable rule. Substantial compliance with rule is proper standard to be applied to admission of blood test evidence and the trial court properly found that offering breath test or urine test prior to blood draw was impractical. Therefore the trial court properly denied motion to suppress blood test results. Read more below: 

About the Author

John P. Rutkowski

Mr. Rutkowski has been practicing law for the past twenty-five years. Prior to going to law school Mr. Rutkowski served as a deputy sheriff before retiring to attend law school. Upon graduating law school Mr. Rutkowski served as a prosecutor in Florida before going in to private practice and representing clients in three states.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact us

John P. Rutkowski, Attorney at Law, firm represents clients in the area of driving under the influence, boating under the influence, Criminal & Civil Traffic Offenses. Contact me today for a free telephone consultation.